The $800K Platform You Probably Don’t Need
I watched a Series B SaaS company spend $680K building a custom ML platform last year. Custom MLflow deployment. Airflow orchestration. Feature store built from scratch. The works.
They had 2 data scientists and 20 models.
The Snowflake ML platform would have handled everything for $180K.
This isn’t an isolated case. I’ve seen this pattern several times in the past two years. Five of those companies over-engineered solutions to problems they didn’t have.
Let’s talk about when you actually need custom ML infrastructure, and when you don’t.
What Snowflake ML Actually Delivers in 2026
First, let’s be clear about what we’re working with. Snowflake ML in 2026 isn’t a starter platform. It’s enterprise-grade infrastructure that scales to massive workloads.
Core Capabilities:
Model Development: Snowflake Notebooks on Container Runtime with GPU support, pre-installed XGBoost and Scikit-learn. You can install any package from HuggingFace or PyPI. Container Runtime distributes data loading and model training automatically.
Feature Store: Fully integrated feature management with automated incremental refresh from batch and streaming sources. Define your feature pipelines once, and they stay updated.
Model Registry: Deploy and manage models trained inside or outside Snowflake. Supports 500+ features per model. Version control, lineage tracking, the whole package.
ML Jobs: Automated ML pipeline orchestration. Dispatch functions from VS Code or PyCharm down to Container Runtime. No manual infrastructure management.
ML Observability: Built-in model monitoring and explainability. Track drift, performance, and business metrics.
ML Lineage: End-to-end traceability from source data through features, datasets, and models. Critical for compliance and debugging.
Cortex AI Integration: Access to LLMs (Mistral, Llama, Anthropic models) and ML functions (forecasting, anomaly detection, classification) via SQL. No separate infrastructure.
That’s not a minimal platform. That’s what most companies actually need.
The Cost Math That Changes Everything
Let’s run the numbers on building custom vs using Snowflake ML.
Custom ML Platform (Year 1):
MLflow deployment and maintenance: $120K
Airflow orchestration: $54K
Feature store (custom built): $180K
Monitoring and observability stack: $65K
GPU infrastructure management: $85K
Platform engineers (0.5 FTE): $120K
Total: $624K-$780K
Snowflake ML (Year 1):
Snowflake ML compute (notebooks, training): $80K-$120K
Model Registry and orchestration: Included
Feature Store: Included
Monitoring: Included
Cortex AI usage: $30K-$50K
Infrastructure management: $0 (serverless)
Total: $110K-$170K
Difference: $450K-$610K saved
That’s not accounting for the 3-6 month faster time to production with Snowflake ML vs building from scratch.
When You Don’t Need Custom Infrastructure
Most companies fall into one of these categories where custom infrastructure adds cost without value:
You Have 2-50 Models in Production
Snowflake ML handles this scale without breaking a sweat. Container Runtime distributes training automatically. The Model Registry manages versioning. ML Jobs orchestrate your pipelines.
Custom infrastructure at this scale is just overhead.
Real example: Mid-market retailer with 8 forecasting models and 4 classification models. Moved from custom Kubernetes + MLflow setup ($280K/year) to Snowflake ML ($95K/year). Same functionality, 65% cost reduction, better governance.
Your Data Lives in Snowflake
If your data warehouse is already Snowflake, why export data to train models elsewhere? Data movement costs money, adds latency, and creates governance headaches.
Snowflake ML trains directly on your warehouse data. No ETL pipelines to external systems, no data duplication, and no transfer costs.
You Need Standard ML Workflows
Classification, regression, forecasting, anomaly detection, time-series analysis. These are table stakes that Snowflake ML handles natively at any scale.
If 80%+ of your ML work fits these patterns, custom infrastructure is unnecessary complexity. Snowflake Notebooks give you flexibility for edge cases.
You Want Your Data Team to Own ML
Not every company needs a dedicated ML platform team. If your data engineers and analysts can handle ML workflows with SQL and Python notebooks, custom infrastructure is overhead.
Container Runtime abstracts away GPU management, distributed training, and scaling. Your team focuses on models, not DevOps.
Compliance and Governance Matter
Snowflake ML inherits Snowflake’s security and governance. RBAC, data masking, row-level security, audit logging. ML Lineage tracks data provenance end-to-end.
Building equivalent governance into a custom platform costs $150K-$300K and takes 6-12 months.
When You Actually Need Custom Infrastructure
Custom infrastructure makes sense in specific scenarios:
You Have Extremely Specialized Requirements
Reinforcement learning. Cutting-edge research models. Highly custom distributed training patterns. If you’re pushing the boundaries of what standard frameworks support, you need flexibility.
Snowflake ML is optimized for production ML patterns. Experimental research might need custom infrastructure.
You Need Sub-100ms Inference Latency
Snowflake Model Registry inference is fast, but not real-time system fast. If you’re serving predictions in high-throughput, super low-latency applications, you need dedicated serving infrastructure.
Snowflake handles batch inference and moderate-latency online serving. Ultra-low-latency requires specialized infrastructure.
ML Platform IS Your Product
If you’re building an ML-as-a-service product, you probably need custom infrastructure. Your platform differentiation requires control that managed solutions don’t provide.
The Real Question: Do You Need ML Platform Engineers?
Here’s what nobody talks about: Custom ML platforms require dedicated platform engineers.
Custom Platform Team (Minimum):
1 Senior ML Platform Engineer: $240K-$320K
0.5 DevOps Engineer: $100K-$140K
Total: $340K-$460K/year
Snowflake ML Approach:
Data engineers and data scientists own ML workflows.
No dedicated platform engineering required.
Platform team cost: $0
That $340K-$460K savings compounds every year you avoid unnecessary custom infrastructure.
Decision Framework: Custom vs Snowflake ML
Use this framework to decide:
Go with Snowflake ML if:
✅ You have fewer than 50 production models
✅ Your data warehouse is Snowflake
✅ Standard ML workflows (classification, regression, forecasting)
✅ Want data engineers to own ML
✅ Compliance and governance are critical
✅ Budget under $500K for ML infrastructure
Build custom infrastructure if:
✅ Specialized requirements (RL, experimental research)
✅ Sub-100ms inference latency required
✅ ML platform is your product
✅ You need capabilities Snowflake ML doesn’t provide
Bottom Line
Snowflake ML in 2026 is production-ready infrastructure that scales to enterprise workloads.
Most companies building custom ML platforms are solving problems they don’t have yet. They’re paying $600K-$800K/year for infrastructure they could replace with $150K-$200K of Snowflake ML.
The math is simple: If you don’t have specialized requirements that Snowflake ML can’t handle, custom infrastructure is unnecessary cost and complexity.
—
Leave a Reply