Your VP of Engineering wants to build everything in-house. Your CFO wants to hire consultants for everything. They’re both at your desk arguing their case, and you’re caught in the middle trying to figure out what actually makes sense for your business.
They’re both right. And they’re both wrong.
The decision to build in-house vs hire consultants isn’t about which approach is “better.” It’s about which approach fits your specific situation, timeline, and constraints. I’ve seen companies make both choices work brilliantly. The difference between success and failure isn’t the choice itself, it’s whether you asked the right questions before making that choice.
Let’s break down the real costs, the hidden trade-offs, and the decision framework that actually works.
The Real Cost Comparison
Most companies look at salary numbers and make their decision. That’s a mistake. You need to look at total cost of ownership over the first 18-24 months, because that’s when the math actually matters.
In-House Team: Year 1 All-In Costs
Let’s say you’re building a 3-person data engineering team. Here’s what you’re actually spending:
Salaries and Benefits:
• 3 Senior Data Engineers: $525K-$630K total
• Health insurance, 401k, taxes: Add 25-30% ($131K-$189K)
• Total compensation: $656K-$819K
Recruiting and Onboarding:
• Recruiting fees (20-25% first year salary): $105K-$157K
• Internal recruiting time: $15K-$25K
• Onboarding and training: $20K-$30K
• Lost productivity first 3 months: $40K-$60K
• Total recruiting/onboarding: $180K-$272K
Tools and Infrastructure:
• Workstations and equipment: $15K-$20K
• Software licenses: $10K-$15K
• Cloud infrastructure: $36K-$60K
• Total tools: $61K-$95K
Management Overhead:
• Manager time (if you need to hire one): $150K-$200K
• Or senior engineer playing tech lead: $30K-$50K opportunity cost
• Total management: $30K-$200K
Year 1 Total: $927K-$1.39M
(That’s for 3 people, assuming no dedicated manager)
Year 2 becomes more reasonable: $656K-$819K (just comp + tools)
Break-even point: 18-24 months
Consultants: Year 1 All-In Costs
Now let’s look at hiring 2 senior consultants on a fractional basis (30 hours/week each, which gives you 60 hours total).
Consultant Fees:
• 2 senior consultants at $150-$200/hour: $234K-$312K
• Or fixed monthly retainer: $20K-$30K/month = $240K-$360K/year
• Total fees: $240K-$360K
Tools and Infrastructure:
• Cloud infrastructure (you still pay this): $36K-$60K
• Platform licenses: $4K-$8K
• Total tools: $40K-$68K
Management Overhead:
• Internal PM/coordinator time: $20K-$30K
• Contract management: $5K-$10K
• Total management: $25K-$40K
Year 1 Total: $305K-$468K
Year 2 stays similar: $305K-$468K (unless you reduce hours)
Break-even point: 6-12 months (faster value delivery)
The math is clear: consultants cost 60-70% less in Year 1. But that’s not the whole story.
What the Numbers Don’t Show
The cost comparison above tells you what you’ll spend. It doesn’t tell you what you’ll get. Here’s what’s missing from the spreadsheet:
In-House Advantages (That Don’t Show Up in Cost)
Institutional Knowledge: Your in-house team learns your business deeply. They understand your data quirks, your technical debt, your political landscape. A consultant might take 3 months to learn what your full-time engineer absorbs in 6 months.
Long-Term Ownership: Your team owns the systems they build. They’ll maintain them, improve them, and be there when things break at 2am. Consultants hand off documentation and move on.
Culture and Collaboration: Your team attends your all-hands, builds relationships with product teams, understands the vision. They’re part of the company, not external vendors.
Proprietary IP Protection: If you’re building truly differentiated data capabilities, you probably don’t want external consultants involved. Your in-house team keeps your secret sauce secret.
Consultant Advantages (That Don’t Show Up in Cost)
Immediate Expertise: You get senior-level talent day one. No 3-month ramp-up. No training. They’ve solved your problem many times before at other companies.
Flexibility: Project done early? Scale down. Need more hands? Scale up. Try doing that with full-time employees. The flexibility alone is worth 20-30% of the cost.
Best Practices from Multiple Companies: Consultants bring patterns and solutions from dozens of companies. Your in-house team brings experience from 1-2 previous jobs. The knowledge transfer is massive.
Risk Mitigation: Bad hire on your team? You’re stuck for 6-12 months minimum. Consultant not working out? End the contract in 30 days.
The Decision Framework That Actually Works
Stop asking “which is cheaper?” Start asking these five questions:
Question 1: How Long Do You Need This Work Done?
Build in-house if:
• You need 3+ full-time people for 2+ years
• The work is ongoing, not project-based
• You’re building a long-term data capability
Hire consultants if:
• You have a 3-12 month project with a clear end
• You need to prove value before committing to full-time hires
• Your needs fluctuate significantly quarter to quarter
Question 2: How Quickly Do You Need Results?
Build in-house if:
• You can wait 6-9 months for the team to be fully productive
• You’re playing the long game (18-24 month horizon)
• You have time to recruit, onboard, and ramp up
Hire consultants if:
• You need something shipped in the next 90 days
• Your board/exec team is impatient
• You need to show value quickly to justify further investment
Question 3: Do You Have Proprietary IP to Protect?
Build in-house if:
• Your data capabilities are core competitive differentiators
• You have proprietary algorithms or models
• You’re in a regulated industry with strict data access requirements
• You can’t risk knowledge walking out the door
Hire consultants if:
• You’re building standard data infrastructure (pipelines, warehouses)
• The work is foundational but not differentiated
• You can protect IP through proper contracts and access controls
Question 4: Can You Afford Senior-Level Talent Full-Time?
Build in-house if:
• You have budget for 3+ senior engineers at $200K+ each
• You can compete for talent in your market
• You have interesting technical problems that attract top talent
Hire consultants if:
• You need senior expertise but can only afford 1-2 people
• You’re in a market where recruiting is brutally hard
• You need multiple specialties but can’t hire 5 people
Question 5: Do You Know What You Need?
Build in-house if:
• You have a clear roadmap and know exactly what to build
• You have experienced data leadership in place
• You’ve done this before at another company
Hire consultants if:
• You’re not sure what “good” looks like
• You need help defining the strategy before executing
• You don’t have data leadership yet (and consultants can help hire your team)
The Hybrid Approach That Actually Works
Here’s the strategy I strongly recommend: Don’t choose. Do both.
Phase 1 (Months 1-6): Consultants Lead
• Hire 1-2 senior consultants
• They build your initial systems and establish best practices
• They help you define what roles you actually need
• They start recruiting for your in-house team
Phase 2 (Months 6-12): Transition
• Hire your first 1-2 full-time engineers
• Consultants train them and hand off systems
• Consultants shift to advisory role (10 hours/week)
• Your team starts owning day-to-day operations
Phase 3 (Months 12+): In-House Owns
• Your team runs everything
• Keep consultants on retainer for 5-10 hours/month
• Use them for specific projects or skill gaps
• Scale your team as needed
This approach gives you:
• Fast time-to-value (consultants ship quickly)
• Knowledge transfer (they train your team)
• Reduced risk (you see results before committing to full team)
• Best of both worlds (expertise + long-term ownership)
The total cost over 18 months is usually $600K-$800K, which is less than building in-house from day one, and you get better results faster.
The Bottom Line
Building in-house costs $600K-$900K in Year 1 for a 3-person team. Hiring consultants costs $300K-$470K for similar output. But the decision isn’t just about cost.
The hybrid approach works best for most companies: consultants for 6-12 months, then transition to in-house. You get speed, expertise, and long-term ownership.
What’s your situation? Let the framework guide you, not just the price tag.
Want more insights on building data teams? Check out my posts on the real cost of building an AI team and when to hire your first data engineer.
Leave a Reply